Thoughts on peptide stability after reconstitution for research use
Posted by protocol21 in Dosing and Protocols
10 Comments
cold2184
My research subjects are always happy with fresh batches. I try to reconstitute weekly at most for most compounds.
quietfox94
I heard some people use smaller reconstitution batches to avoid this problem entirely. Just mix what you need for a few days.
protocol88
Honestly, unless you have access to HPLC or something similar to test potency, it's all just guesswork. Better safe than sorry and use them quickly.
biohackguy72
Anyone have actual scientific papers on this? I've looked but it's surprisingly hard to find specific stability data for reconstituted research peptides.
protocol21
Good point about light exposure! I always keep them in amber vials or wrapped in foil. My question is more about the inherent chemical stability in solution.
vialmind
From my experience, BPC 157 seems pretty robust for at least a couple of weeks refrigerated. I haven't noticed any drop off in efficacy in my research subjects during that time frame.
rust_pdx86
Are we talking about light exposure too? Because that definitely plays a role. Always keep them in the dark, even in the fridge.
vialdev
Yeah, BPC is usually fine. TB 500 though, I feel like it degrades faster. I try to use that one within a week if possible. Just a gut feeling from my observations.
vialfiles38
It varies wildly by peptide. Some are super fragile, others are pretty robust. Growth hormone secretagogues, for instance, seem to be more sensitive in my limited experience.
cyclegal27
I agree with the 'use quickly' sentiment. Why risk compromising your research data for the sake of a few extra days? The cost of the peptide is usually less than the cost of flawed data.