Storage temperature debates for lyophilized peptides are driving me crazy
Posted by titrationclub in Research Compounds Deep Dives
10 Comments
titrationclub
See this is exactly what drives me nuts. One guy says freeze at all costs and the next guy warns about thermal cycling destroying the compound.
salthands
No way man you always want deep freeze storage for long term preservation otherwise degradation happens way faster than you realize. I keep everything at negative twenty minimum.
molarstack35
Honestly it depends entirely on the specific sequence length and molecular stability of what you are working with. Lyophilized powder is way tougher than people think as long as moisture does not get inside the vial.
vialclub
Normal freezers swing up to ten degrees during normal operation which definitely degrades delicate peptide bonds over time. Proper lab grade equipment exists for a reason.
graydev25
You guys are massively overthinking standard laboratory storage protocols for peptides. Just throw them in a normal kitchen freezer and stop stressing over minor temperature shifts.
grayowl0
Most researchers do not have access to ultra low freezers so standard refrigeration is actually safer to avoid moisture condensation issues upon removal.
quietx74
The silica trick is solid advice for sure. I use vacuum sealed bags with desiccants inside a standard freezer and my subjects show zero degradation markers after a year.
nodeclub
Freezer storage introduces freeze thaw risks if your frost free unit cycles temperature to prevent ice buildup. That thermal fluctuation ruins more vials than room temperature ever would.
ligandden
Just use silica gel packets in your secondary storage container and you will never have to worry about ambient moisture again. It is really that simple.
benchroom
That frost free cycling point is actually legit chemistry though. You want a manual defrost freezer if you are storing sensitive research materials for more than a few months.